|
Professional social work journal focusing on families and communities. We feature research and theory, direct-practice issues, and the delivery and management of services. |
||
|
Evidence-Based Practice or Practice-Based Evidence: What Is Happening With MEPA and Current Adoption Practices?
Susan C. Mapp, Needha Boutté-Queen, Stephen “Arch” Erich, & Patricia Taylor
Families in Society,
2008, v. 89,
no. 3, page(s) 375-384
Document Type: Article
| DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.3763
Article PDF (Subscriber-only Access)** | Account login | Order a subscription
The Multiethnic Placement Act (MEPA) and Interethnic Placement Act (IEPA) were passed in an attempt to eliminate race as a barrier to adoption. The purposes of the current research were to discover what child welfare social workers know about MEPA and IEPA, their views about the usefulness of the acts in addressing race issues in adoption, and how these two acts have affected their child placement practices. A randomized nationwide survey of social workers in child welfare had 261 respondents. Respondents seemed knowledgeable about the acts, but they remained uncertain about their intended purpose and lacked knowledge about research on transracial adoption (TRA). The majority of respondents indicated race is a continuing factor in adoptive placements.
E-mail
this abstract with a personal
message.
(You must be
logged in
to use this feature.
Register here for a new user account.)
PDF**Article Access
Free to All—Article access is for all readers.
Free to Registered Users—Article access is for readers who register for a free online account.
Subscriber-only Access—Article access is for readers who have an online subscription.
*CE Credit
Continuing education credit (CEU) based on Families in Society articles can be earned online.
©
2012